John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor of England, supporter of King Henry VI, eventual ambassador for Edward IV, ardent foe of King Richard III, and crucial ally of King Henry VII, passed away on 15 September 1500.
Although Bishop Morton was a devout Lancastrian, when all hope was gone – after the deaths of both Edward of Westminster, Prince of Wales and Henry VI – he bowed to the inevitable and became a loyal and valued servant to King Edward VI. Morton would have probably assumed the Lancastrian defeat was God’s will, and there was no one left on the Lancastrian side who was a reasonable candidate for the throne. Even if the Lancastrian scion, Henry Tudor, had not been a child at the time, he was so distantly related to the throne that no one really considered him to be a viable contender for the crown. Morton would not have really considered leaving England to join Henry Tudor in exile, the way he had for Edward of Westminster. Henry Tudor’s shaky claim to be king is why King Edward was content to leave the boy under benign house-arrest in Brittany for years. Henry Tudor just wasn’t that much of a threat.
Edward VI pardoned Morton in July of 1471, and made Morton the Master of Chancery that September. Morton did such a good job of it that Edward VI made him Master of the Rolls in March of 1472. As the king’s faith in Morton’s loyalty rose, so did Morton. He was appointed “archdeacon of Winchester and Dean of the Court of Arches in 1474, canon of Wells from 1475 to 1478, archdeacon of Berkshire in 1476 and archdeacon of Norfolkin 1477. He was appointed Master of the Rolls from 1472 to 1479″ and made the ambassador to the French court in February of 1477. As a final coup, Morton was “appointed Bishop of Ely by King Edward on 8 August 1478 and he was consecrated on 31 January 1479.”
When Edward IV died on 9 April 1483, Bishop Morton was one of the executors of the late king’s will. He was also prepared to serve the new boy-king, Edward V of England, as ably as he had served the 12 year old’s father. He, along with die-hard Yorkists like William Hastings, 1st Baron Hastings, became both uneasy and suspicious when Richard of Gloucester kept delaying Edward V’s coronation. Morton, like Baron Hastings, was implacably against Richard becoming king in Edward V’s place, and was one of the many high-ranking men to thwart Richard’s plan to execute the king’s uncle, Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers, and Richard Grey.
Morton’s unease soon became bone-deep hatred for Richard. On 13 June 1483 during a council meeting at the Tower of London. Richard, aided by the Duke of Buckingham, accused Hastings during a council meeting of conspiring against his life with the King Edward V’s maternal relatives, the Woodvilles, via Hastings’s mistress Jane Shore.
This was complete hogwash, since Hastings distrusted the Woodvilles and was the one who had sent for Richard to come in haste from York to prevent the Woodville’s from taking control of the new king’s regency. Richard and Buckingham had Hastings, the Lord Chamberlain and one of the most powerful Yorkist adherents, dragged out into the courtyard of the Tower and executed without trial. Apparently Hastings didn’t even get the dignity of a scaffold, but was beheaded over a handy log.
Bishop Morton was spared a beheading, but he was thrown into the Tower and accused of plotting against Richard. (Although there is no evidence Morton wanted to plot against Richard before his arrest, Morton certainly went to it after.) Oxford University petitioned for the bishop’s release, but Richard refused. The bishop was only in the Tower for a few weeks before he was sent be imprisoned at Brecknock Castle under the care of Richard’s dearest ally, Buckingham.
Since his position as Bishop of Ely made Morton one of the foremost men in the realm, he had some ability to communicate even while a prisoner. Morton immediately began conspiring with Reginald Bray, dowager Queen Elizabeth Woodville, and Margaret Beaufort to free the Princes in the Tower, and to stage and insurrection against Richard III in order to put Edward V back on his rightful throne. However, sometime in September of 1483 the plans changed. Buckingham had turned against Richard and joined Morton’s cabal. Moreover, the goal of the rebellion became to overthrow Richard III in favor of the Lancastrian long-shot, Henry Tudor.
Frankly, I think Buckingham turned against Richard because he found out the Princes in the Tower were murdered. Only the conviction that none of Edward IV’s male heirs were left alive could have spurred Morton and the others to look to Henry Tudor as a rival king.
Morton ‘escaped’ from Brecknock Castle and after the weather scuppered Buckingham’s Rebellion in October 1483, and the bishop set sail for Flanders, where he was out of Richard III’s reach. Morton then spent the next two years acting as the go-between for fellow anti-Ricardian sympathisers and trying to convince other members of the British nobility to support Henry Tudor’s attempt to grab the throne.
After the successful Tudor invasion to depose King Richard III, Bishop Morton returned to England to serve in King Henry VII’s court. Morton eventually became one of the new king’s most trusted advisors. Under Henry VII, Morton became Archbishop of Canterbury on 6 October 1486, and was appointed Lord Chancellor in 1487. Morton was also tasked with repairing the crown’s finances. Edward IV had been a dashing warrior king, but he had been really bad with money and government, and Britain was in debt up to it’s eyeballs. Henry VII, a much more able administrator, was determined to refill the royal treasury and trusted Morton to help him.
Morton came through for the king. He is the one reported to have devised as crude test, known as ‘Morton’s Fork‘, to insure that everyone had to pay their taxes: “If the subject is seen to live frugally, tell him because he is clearly a money saver of great ability, he can afford to give generously to the King. If, however, the subject lives a life of great extravagance, tell him he, too, can afford to give largely, the proof of his opulence being evident in his expenditure.”
Annoying as the fork was, it worked. Morton’s tax policy, which was carried out by Henry’s ministers Edmund Dudley and Richard Empson, repaired the kingdom’s coffers.
In exchange for all their hard work trying to retrench a nearly-bankrupt nation, the me were almost universally despised. The populace disliked Henry VII, finding him more penny-pinching than regal, and the peers hated Morton, Dudley, and Empson with a fiery passion. After Henry VII’s death, Cardinal Wolsey advised the new monarch, King Henry VIII, to execute Dudley and Empson in a bid to increase his early popularity, which the 17 year old sovereign was happy to do. Morton, however, had passed away peacefully in his sleep at his home in Knole House almost a decade before Henry VIII came to the throne, and thus escaped Dudley and Empson’s fate. Morton had become a cardinal in 1493, and had been elected Chancellor of Oxford University in 1495, so he may have been too powerful to kill even if he had been alive at the beginning of Henry VIII’s reign. He may have even been able to save Dudley and Empson.
As directed by his last wishes, Cardinal Morton had been buried before the altar of Our Lady Undercroft, in Canterbury Cathedral. Although his body is buried in the central chapel of the cathedral’s crypt, Morton’s cenotaph (a memorial tomb) stands in the south-east part of the crypt. It was badly damaged by Puritan zealots in the 17th century, but can still be seen at the cathedral today. Careful inspection will reveal carvings of angels, St Christopher, cardinal’s caps, and beer barrels (called tuns) with MOR inscribed on top of them. This is a pun on his name, Mor/tun = Morton.
Morton’s most famous protégé was Sir Thomas More, who served as a page in Morton’s establishment. It is believed that More was the author of the History of King Richard III based on Morton’s first-hand accounts of what happened after the death of Edward IV. Ricardians, of course, think that the whole book is a rank stew of lies concocted by Morton and refined by More in order to slander King Richard III in an attempt to justify Henry VII’s usurpation.
To be frank, I think William Hastings, the Earl of Rivers, and Richard Grey, and the 2nd Duke of Buckingham would have agreed with Cardinal Morton’s assessment of Richard III.
Meanwhile, King Henry VIII — having very little of his father’s fiscal prudence and too much of his grandfather’s extravagant tastes – subsequently bankrupted the country again during his reign. His children, the short-lived King Edward VI and the long-reigning Queen Elizabeth I, who both took after their canny grandfather Henry VII, would have to put Britain back together again after their father’s death. Fortunately, these Tudor heirs were well up for the task.
Interesting article. I guess even Richard would not dare execute the Archbishop of Canterbury, although I would not be so very certain, since there was an Archbishop of York who was once executed, and under King John the Archbishop of Canterbury was virtually exiled.
Those Medieval Clerics were not adverse to involvement in politics, intriguing and scheming, after all.
I have read that ‘Morton’s Fork’ existed before Henry’s reign: I think Nathen Amin suggests Edward IV might have utilized it. Really not sure I agree with the title of that book describing Edward as ‘England’s Forgotten King’ myself. I would not call him ‘forgotten’.
I think Edward VI was ‘forgotten’ because so many histories of the Tudors seemed to skim over his reign to get to the juicy stuff under Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth.