Kyra Cornelius Kramer

Latromathematics

kyra

I have noticed that nearly everyone, regardless of how staunchly they disavow astrology, is curious about the traits of their sign if someone is talking about it at a party. I am no different. When I was researching Tudor medical practices, I confess that I was enthralled while reading about latromathematics, or “medical astrology — an ancient medical system that associates each horoscope sign with a corresponding body part”, which was a very significant part of Tudor health care.

The idea that the person’s horoscope, and the motion of the planets, influenced the health and well-being of an individual was an undisputed scientific fact until relatively recently. It was certainly embraced fully but Tudor physicians. Moreover, the way latromathematics was calculated was surprisingly complex, and was one of the reasons a Tudor doctor had to be as much of a magnetisation and astronomer as a healer. A patient’s health was determined by the way astrological factors in the natal chart were aspected, or at what angle the planets were aligned with other heavenly bodies. Some aspects were considered favourable, while others were considered actively harmful, and part of the Tudor doctor’s job was to do the math that would tell him which way the stars were leaning.

It wasn’t enough to be able to formulate a simple horoscope. The Tudor physician had to know how the movement of the planets would effect his patient. For example, Capricorn  ‘ruled’ a person’s bones, hair, and skin … but whether it would be for good or for ill would depend on the aspects of the patient’s birth. If their natal chart had favourable planets in trine, they would have strong bones that were unlikely to ever be broken, smoothly working joints, lustrous hair, and lovely skin. In contrast, they would have particularly bad problems with those parts of their body — frequently broken bones, aching joints, arthritis, hair loss, blemishes, early wrinkles, scaring —  if their horoscope had unfavourable square planetary aspects.

Moreover, the way the parts of the body were influenced by celestial factors could change over time as the planets transited through the natal horoscope. This would have been the medical explanation for Henry VIII’s  a robust youth compared to his dreadful constitution in middle age. Although some ill-health was seen as a natural result of ageing, the specific forms that ill-health would take, and the severity of the issues, were believed to be the result of the way in which planets were transiting  through a person’s natal chart.

While there was a general consensus about which planet or star sign effected which body parts and medical conditions, physicians from different schools of thought would sometimes have differing opinions about the specifics. For instance, some doctors argued that Capricorn influenced the teeth (as offshoots of the skeletal system) while others assigned teeth to Aquarius. Moreover, there was some overlap between signs and planets. For example, Leo affected the spine even though bones, in general, were under Capricorn’s authority, while both Cancer, Leo, and Virgo all had influence over digestive problems. There was also strange variance, such as the fact that Aries was believed to indicate whether or not there would be eye ailments, but nonetheless Pisces was thought to have a positive influence on the eyes. However, as a rule of thumb, the following astrological factors were thought to influence these general bodily functions:

The planets were also believed to influence the body, just like the signs of the Zodiac did. However, the planets Uranus, Neptune and Saturn had yet to be discovered, so their influences were assigned at a later date. Since I am just discussing Tudor medical beliefs, I’ll only include the heavenly bodies that the Tudors knew about and applied to their medical treatments.

It was also assumed that the basis for the medical weaknesses and strengths inherent in certain signs were a manifestation of the emotional/psychological ‘energies’ of that sign. This was put down to the idea that each sign could make an excess of, or be deficient in, a particular one of the four humours: blood, yellow bile, black bile, or phlegm.

Henry VIII (whose horoscope can be configured as 7 July 1491 due to the change in the Gregorian calendar in 1750) was a Cancer with a Virgo ascendant and an Aries moon. Tudor scholars looking at his natal chart would have been expected him to have been an bold, militaristic, athletic youth, very sentimental and in love with being in love, highly sexed, prone to head injuries, headaches, suffering from a ‘delicate’ digestion, with risks of melancholy, mental illness, and worsening constipation as he aged.  He would have been expected to have developed grave health issues as a result of any mental or emotional irritations occurring in his life. It was fortunate (depending how you look at it) for his doctors that the king’s courtiers so often gave him “irritations” that could explain his increasing infirmities and mental aberrations after midlife!

I am a Pisces, and happily for any Tudor physicians I should happen upon I have very, very tender and easily hurt feet, am prone to catch any cold that wanders by in a ten mile radius, and I definitely suffer from over-sensitivity! I also have the big booty expected of a Pisces/Libra mix … like Kim Kardashian, funnily enough.

How about you? Do you have any coincidental connections between your astrological predictions and your real life?